Top court denies right of Chinese individuals to seek war reparation

TOKYO, Japan - Two former Chinese laborers and relatives of three deceased workers walk to the Supreme Court with their supporters on April 27 to hear a court ruling on their damages suit. The top court later ruled that Chinese individuals have no right to demand war reparations from Japan under postwar agreements in its first ruling on the controversial issue.

Sample
PDF Preview

Product Code
ILEA001122470

Registered date
2007/4/27 00:00:00

Credit
Kyodo / Kyodo News Images

Media source
2007 Kyodo News

Media size
1864 × 1112 pixel

Resolution
dpi

Deployment size
775.80(KB)*

Special instruction

*File size when opened in Photoshop, etc.

Similar Images & Videos

Korean plaintiffs in wartime labor suit

Plaintiffs in a damages suit involving Koreans forced to work in Japan during World War II are seen in front of South Korea's Supreme Court in Seoul ahead of a ruling on the case on Jan. 25, 2024.

Wartime forced labor suit in S. Korea

Kim Seong Ju, one of the plaintiffs in a damages suit involving Koreans who were forced to work in Japan during World War II, speaks to reporters in Seoul on Nov. 29, 2018, following the South Korean Supreme Court's ruling ordering major Japanese manufacturer Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. to pay damages to two groups of South Koreans. (Kyodo) ==Kyodo

Wartime forced labor suit in S. Korea

Kim Seong Ju (L), one of the plaintiffs in a damages suit involving Koreans who were forced to work in Japan during World War II, speaks to reporters in Seoul on Nov. 29, 2018, following the South Korean Supreme Court's ruling ordering major Japanese manufacturer Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. to pay damages to two groups of South Koreans. (Kyodo) ==Kyodo

Wartime forced labor suit in S. Korea

Kim Seong Ju, one of the plaintiffs in a damages suit involving Koreans who were forced to work in Japan during World War II, reacts on Nov. 29, 2018, following the South Korean Supreme Court's ruling ordering major Japanese manufacturer Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. to pay damages to two groups of South Koreans. (Kyodo) ==Kyodo

Wartime forced labor suit in S. Korea

Kim Seong Ju, one of the plaintiffs in a damages suit involving Koreans who were forced to work in Japan during World War II, speaks to reporters prior to the South Korean Supreme Court's ruling on the case in Seoul on Nov. 29, 2018. The court ordered major Japanese manufacturer Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. to pay damages to two groups of South Koreans for wartime forced labor. (Kyodo) ==Kyodo

Korean plaintiffs in wartime labor suit

SEOUL, South Korea, Nov. 29 Kyodo - Plaintiffs in a damages suit involving Koreans forced to work in Japan during World War II are seen ahead of their visit to South Korea's Supreme Court in Seoul to hear a ruling on the case on Nov.29, 2018.

Top court rejects hospital's demotion of pregnant worker

TOKYO, Japan - Nami Shimonaka, a lawyer who represents a physical therapist filing a damages suit against a hospital for her demotion due to pregnancy, speaks at a news conference in Hiroshima on Oct. 23, 2014, after the Supreme Court's decision in favor of the therapist. The top court rejected a high court ruling that the hospital was within its rights to demote the therapist who sought a lighter workload due to her pregnancy.

Top court says gov't liable for asbestos exposure

TOKYO, Japan - Supporters hold up banners after the Supreme Court rules in favor of plaintiffs who sued the central government seeking compensation for damage to health from asbestos, in front of the top court in Tokyo on Oct. 9, 2014. The court ruled for the first time in Japan that the government was responsible for failing to prevent workers from being exposed to harmful asbestos.

Top court upholds paternity even if blood ties disproved by DNA test

TOKYO, Japan - Photo taken on July 17, 2014, shows the First Petty Bench of Japan's Supreme Court in Tokyo. It ruled the results of DNA tests are not enough to revoke paternity of a child even if they disprove any biological relation to the assumed father. In its first ruling on the issue, the top court said DNA tests cannot change paternity status established under the Civil Code.