Court in Osaka says 2014 vote gap in "state of unconstitutionality"

Court in Osaka says 2014 vote gap in "state of unconstitutionality"

Plaintiffs' attorneys hold a banner stating "in a state of unconstitutionality" in front of the Osaka High Court on March 23, 2015, after the court ruled that the lower house election in December 2014 was "in a state of unconstitutionality" due to a disparity in the weight of votes between districts, but rejected the plaintiffs' demand that its results be nullified. Similar decisions were made by other courts earlier in the same month. (Kyodo) ==Kyodo

  • Product Code
  • ILEA000065984
  • Registered date
  • 2015/3/23 11:59:44
  • Credit
  • Kyodo / Kyodo News Images
  • Media source
  • Media size
  • 3308 × 2532 pixel
  • Resolution
  • 240 dpi
  • Deployment size
  • 987.67(KB)*
  • Special instruction

*File size when opened in Photoshop, etc.

Similar Images & Videos
    Court rules Oct. 2017 Japan general election constitutional

    Court rules Oct. 2017 Japan general election constitutional

    Photo shows a courtroom at the Akita branch of the Sendai High Court in Akita Prefecture, northern Japan, where the vote weight disparity in the October 2017 House of Representatives election was ruled constitutional on Jan. 30, 2018. (Pool photo)(Kyodo) ==Kyodo
      Court ruling on Oct. 2017 Japan general election

      Court ruling on Oct. 2017 Japan general election

      A lawyer holds a signboard protesting against vote disparity on his way to a Sendai High Court branch in Akita, Japan, on Jan. 30, 2018. The court ruled the vote disparity in the House of Representatives election in October 2017 was constitutional. (Kyodo) ==Kyodo
        Vote gap in July election ruled "constitutional" in final suit

        Vote gap in July election ruled "constitutional" in final suit

        Hidetoshi Masunaga, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, holds a press conference in Nagoya on Nov. 8, 2016, after the Nagoya High Court ruled the vote weight gap in the July upper house election was "constitutional" in the last of 16 similar lawsuits filed nationwide. (Kyodo) ==Kyodo
          Court dismisses suit demanding July election annulment

          Court dismisses suit demanding July election annulment

          Plaintiffs' lawyers hold a banner outside the Sendai High Court with a message criticizing a ruling by the court in northeastern Japan on Nov. 7, 2016, after the court dismissed a suit demanding that the outcome of the July upper house election be annulled, despite finding the vote weight gap of up to 3.08 times between the most and least represented constituencies "in a state of unconstitutionality." (Kyodo) ==Kyodo
            July upper house poll "constitutional" despite vote disparity: court

            July upper house poll "constitutional" despite vote disparity: court

            Plaintiffs' lawyers hold a banner outside the Sapporo High Court with a message criticizing a ruling by the court in northern Japan on Nov. 2, 2016, after the court judged an upper house election "constitutional" despite the maximum disparity of 3.08 times between the most and least populated constituencies. (Kyodo) ==Kyodo
              Court rejects suit over vote gap in July upper house election

              Court rejects suit over vote gap in July upper house election

              Lawyers seeking nullification of the 2016 upper house election in Japan due to the vote value disparity attend a press conference on Oct. 31, 2016, in Fukuoka after the Fukuoka High Court rejected their lawsuit. But the court said the maximum disparity of 3.08 times between the most and least populated constituencies in the July 10 election was "in a state of unconstitutionality." (Kyodo) ==Kyodo
                Court rejects suit over vote gap in July upper house election

                Court rejects suit over vote gap in July upper house election

                Lawyers seeking to invalid the July 2016 House of Councillors election in Japan due to the vote weight disparity head to the Hiroshima High Court on Oct. 28, 2016, to hear its ruling. The court rejected a suit demanding invalidation of the election's outcome, while saying the maximum disparity of 3.08 times between the most and least populated constituencies was "in a state of unconstitutionality." (Kyodo) ==Kyodo
                  Suit seeking to void upper house election over vote gap nixed

                  Suit seeking to void upper house election over vote gap nixed

                  Takanori Hirai (far R), a lawyer representing plaintiffs who sought to nullify the 2016 upper house election due to the vote weight disparity, meets with reporters on Oct. 26, after the Matsue branch of the Hiroshima High Court turned down the lawsuit. The court said, however, the maximum disparity of 3.08 times between the most and least populated constituencies in the July election was "in a state of unconstitutionality." (Kyodo) ==Kyodo
                    Naha court rejects suit seeking nullification of upper house race

                    Naha court rejects suit seeking nullification of upper house race

                    A lawyer (C) meets with reporters on Oct. 20, 2016, in front of the Naha branch of the Fukuoka High Court, which turned down a lawsuit seeking to nullify the July upper house election outcome over the disparity in the relative value of votes between constituencies. (Kyodo) ==Kyodo
                      Court rules vote weight disparity "unconstitutional"

                      Court rules vote weight disparity "unconstitutional"

                      Lawyers display the contents of the decision of the Osaka High Court, which determined on Oct. 20, 2016, that the vote weight disparity in the July upper house election was "in a state of unconstitutionality," while turning down a lawsuit seeking to invalidate the election. (Kyodo) ==Kyodo